Reddit Tells Australian Court It’s Not a Typical Social Media Platform in Fight Against Under-16 Ban
Reddit has pushed back against Australia’s proposed under-16 social media ban, arguing in court that it operates differently from mainstream platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok. The company insists that its structure and purpose make the blanket age restriction unfair and unsuitable.
Why Reddit Says It’s Different
Reddit’s legal team told the Federal Court that its platform is built around topic-based communities (subreddits) rather than personal profiles. According to Reddit, users interact anonymously and focus on interests, not identity a model they claim reduces the risks typically associated with traditional social media platforms.
Unlike apps where personal data, private messaging, and influencer-driven content dominate, Reddit argues that its system encourages public discussions, moderation by community volunteers, and transparency, making it less harmful for younger users.
The Battle Over Australia’s Social Media Crackdown
Australia’s proposed law would require platforms to verify the ages of all users and restrict access for anyone under 16 unless granted parental consent. It’s part of a wider effort to protect minors from online harm and enforce stronger safety measures.
Reddit warns that strict age-verification requirements could:
- Undermine user privacy
- Exclude harmless communities meant for learning and support
- Create technical and logistical challenges for platforms built on anonymity
What Happens Next?
The Australian court will continue reviewing arguments from Reddit and other tech companies as debates intensify over how to balance youth safety, privacy, and internet freedom.
For now, Reddit maintains that while it supports safer online environments, it should not be categorized or regulated the same way as social networks built on personal identity.
